Antirealism: A History
Location
King Building 121
Document Type
Presentation
Start Date
4-27-2019 5:00 PM
End Date
4-27-2019 6:20 PM
Abstract
Despite the apparent historical divide, in 20th-century philosophy, between primarily-Anglophone Analytic philosophy and Franco-German Continental philosophy, there are a number of striking affinities between the positions of the American Pragmatist tradition and many of the veins of European thought that tend to be grouped together as “postmodern” or “poststructuralist.” Indeed, it’s possible to construct out of those affinities a shared metaphilosophical framework which I here tentatively call “Antirealism.” If this possibility could be established as more than purely coincidental, it would speak to the mutual intelligibility and reciprocal relevance of those two disparate traditions. In my work, I try to show that Antirealism, as an orientation, can be subdivided into three related points, which respectively express the broad Epistemological, Metaphysical, and Ethical perspective of the Antirealist framework. These points, in turn, can themselves be found in the work of a series of (mostly 19th-century) philosophers who, taken together, constitute a shared genealogy for both modern Antirealist traditions. Through readings of Kant, Hegel, Emerson and Nietzsche (so paired because of the importance to my account of the oft-overlooked influence of the former on the latter), and Wittgenstein, I try to trace this genealogy.
Keywords:
Philosophy, History
Recommended Citation
Diener, Ben, "Antirealism: A History" (04/27/19). Senior Symposium. 1.
https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/seniorsymp/2019/panel_21/1
Major
Philosophy; English
Advisor(s)
Martin Thomson-Jones, Philosophy
DeSales Harrison, English
Project Mentor(s)
Todd Ganson, Philosophy
April 2019
Antirealism: A History
King Building 121
Despite the apparent historical divide, in 20th-century philosophy, between primarily-Anglophone Analytic philosophy and Franco-German Continental philosophy, there are a number of striking affinities between the positions of the American Pragmatist tradition and many of the veins of European thought that tend to be grouped together as “postmodern” or “poststructuralist.” Indeed, it’s possible to construct out of those affinities a shared metaphilosophical framework which I here tentatively call “Antirealism.” If this possibility could be established as more than purely coincidental, it would speak to the mutual intelligibility and reciprocal relevance of those two disparate traditions. In my work, I try to show that Antirealism, as an orientation, can be subdivided into three related points, which respectively express the broad Epistemological, Metaphysical, and Ethical perspective of the Antirealist framework. These points, in turn, can themselves be found in the work of a series of (mostly 19th-century) philosophers who, taken together, constitute a shared genealogy for both modern Antirealist traditions. Through readings of Kant, Hegel, Emerson and Nietzsche (so paired because of the importance to my account of the oft-overlooked influence of the former on the latter), and Wittgenstein, I try to trace this genealogy.
Notes
Session VII, Panel 21 - Philosophical | Justice
Moderator: Todd Ganson, Professor of Philosophy