A Covenantal Theology of Protest: The Jewish Tradition of Moral Confrontation with God
Location
King Building 243
Document Type
Presentation
Start Date
4-27-2018 11:00 AM
End Date
4-27-2018 12:20 PM
Abstract
In this thesis, I contend that a robust moral and political framework can be best located within theistic Judaism through a covenantal theology of protest that centers the Jewish tradition of moral confrontation with God. Prior attempts at Jewish liberation theology have relied on universalistic hermeneutics that weaken the authority of Jewish tradition, covenant, and commandment. I outline an alternative theological framework by tracing covenantal agency in the writings of theologians Abraham Joshua Heschel and David Hartman, explicating Hartman’s use of Maimonidean harmonization to reconcile religious and ethical imperatives. By presenting a short survey of Biblical and Rabbinic texts that understand unresolved moral confrontation with God as normative to the covenantal relationship, I suggest an emendation to Hartman’s theology that emphasizes confrontation over harmonization. This theological approach can both be rooted in Jewish sources and allow for a religious and political paradigm emphasizing justice and compassion for all human life.
Keywords:
political theology, liberation theology, Biblical and rabbinic literature, Israel/Palestine
Recommended Citation
Aronson, Ethan, "A Covenantal Theology of Protest: The Jewish Tradition of Moral Confrontation with God" (04/27/18). Senior Symposium. 9.
https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/seniorsymp/2018/presentations/9
Major
Religion
Advisor(s)
Cindy Chapman, Religion
Project Mentor(s)
Corey Barnes, Religion
April 2018
A Covenantal Theology of Protest: The Jewish Tradition of Moral Confrontation with God
King Building 243
In this thesis, I contend that a robust moral and political framework can be best located within theistic Judaism through a covenantal theology of protest that centers the Jewish tradition of moral confrontation with God. Prior attempts at Jewish liberation theology have relied on universalistic hermeneutics that weaken the authority of Jewish tradition, covenant, and commandment. I outline an alternative theological framework by tracing covenantal agency in the writings of theologians Abraham Joshua Heschel and David Hartman, explicating Hartman’s use of Maimonidean harmonization to reconcile religious and ethical imperatives. By presenting a short survey of Biblical and Rabbinic texts that understand unresolved moral confrontation with God as normative to the covenantal relationship, I suggest an emendation to Hartman’s theology that emphasizes confrontation over harmonization. This theological approach can both be rooted in Jewish sources and allow for a religious and political paradigm emphasizing justice and compassion for all human life.
Notes
Session I, Panel 3 - Political | Confrontations
Moderator: Zeinab Abul-Magd, Associate Professor of History and Chair of International Studies