How Do We Measure and Increase Systems Thinking? Comparing Self-Reported and Performative Metrics in Response to Building Causal Loop Models
Abstract
Systems thinking is a mindset and skill essential to understanding and addressing complex challenges. However, increasing and measuring systems thinking is difficult. In this research, we compared multiple approaches to measuring systems thinking, including self-reported measures of a systems thinking mindset and performative measures of systems thinking skills (i.e., participants' reasoning about a system and metrics derived from participants' causal model diagrams of a system). We also evaluated whether systems thinking is specific to disciplinary domains (ecological vs. economic). Finally, we assessed whether building causal models increased systems thinking. Self-report and performative measures of systems thinking were related but not redundant. Metrics derived from participants' models correlated with some but not all measures of systems thinking. Systems thinking partially generalizes across domains. The process of creating models increased self-reported, but not performative, measures of systems thinking. Measuring systems thinking appears to require a multimethod approach that includes performative assessment.
Repository Citation
Frantz, Cynthia McPherson, Julia Blotner, and John E. Petersen. 2025. "How Do We Measure and Increase Systems Thinking? Comparing Self-Reported and Performative Metrics in Response to Building Causal Loop Models." Systems Research and Behavioral Science xxxx
Publisher
Wiley
Publication Date
10-1-2025
Publication Title
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Department
Psychology
Additional Department
Environmental Studies
Document Type
Abstract
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3208
Notes
Additional Department: Biology
Keywords
Causal loop models, Feedback, Fuzzy cognitive map, Modelling, Systems thinking
Language
English
Format
text
