Sovereignty under the League of Nations Mandates: The jurists' Debates
Abstract
The mandate system took shape at an inflexion point in the evolution from an international system based on rule over territories to one based on rule over peoples. Political compromises made at the Paris Peace Conference resulted in the creation of a new political agent, the League of Nations Mandate, with no clear sovereign. In seeking to systematize this political outcome, jurists located sovereignty with the victorious Great Powers, the League itself, and with the peoples of the mandate territories. Yet they never achieved a consensus, which created an absence at the centre of the mandate system that politics would have to fill throughout the interwar period.
Repository Citation
Smith, Leonard V. 2019. "Sovereignty under the League of Nations Mandates: The jurists' Debates." Journal of the History of International Law 21(4): 563-587.
Publisher
Brill Academic
Publication Date
12-1-2019
Publication Title
Journal of the History of International Law
Department
History
Document Type
Article
DOI
https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718050-12340133
Keywords
Mandate system, Trusteeship, Popular sovereignty, League of Nations, Wilsonianism, Periphery, Semi-periphery, Annexation
Language
English
Format
text