Abstract

After the Great War, Woodrow Wilson challenged the foundations of international law based on fully sovereign states. 'Wilsonianism' as elaborated in the Fourteen Points, and in other speeches, rested on a logic that made a universalized liberal individual the locus of sovereignty in the new world order. The truly radical implications of Wilsonianism had no sterner critic than Robert Lansing, Wilson's secretary of state and one of the founders of the American Journal of International Law. Lansing held tenaciously to a positivist paradigm of international law as it had evolved by the early twentieth century. This article reconsiders the conflict between Wilson and Lansing not so much as a duel between individuals as a duel between conflicting conceptions of sovereignty and the purpose of international law in the new world order.

Publisher

Brill Academic Publishers

Publication Date

1-1-2011

Publication Title

Journal of the History of International Law

Department

History

Document Type

Article

DOI

https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180511X552081

Keywords

International law--History, International law--Philosophy, Sovereignty (Political science), Autonomy, World War, 1914-1918, Intellectual life, Influence, United States--Politics and government--1913-1921, 20th century

Document Version

post-print

Language

English

Format

text

Included in

History Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.