Abstract

When candidates engage in robust policy debate, it gives citizens clear choices on issues that matter. Previous studies of issue engagement have primarily used indicators of campaign strategy that are mediated by reporters (e. g., newspaper articles) or indicators that may exclude candidates in less competitive races (e. g., television advertisements). We study issue engagement with data from a unique source, congressional candidate Web sites, that are unmediated and representative of both House and Senate campaigns. We find that the saliency of issues in public opinion is a primary determinant of candidate engagement. And, despite the unique capacity of the Internet to allow candidates to explain their positions on a large number of issues, candidates continue to behave strategically, selecting a few issues on which to engage their adversaries.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Publication Date

2-1-2010

Publication Title

Social Science Computer Review

Department

Politics

Document Type

Article

DOI

10.1177/0894439309335485

Keywords

Issue engagement, Candidate web sites, Internet, Congressional campaigns

Document Version

post-print

Language

English

Format

text

Share

COinS