Event Title
Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning
Location
Science Center, Bent Corridor
Start Date
10-2-2015 12:00 PM
End Date
10-2-2015 1:20 PM
Poster Number
49
Abstract
Metaphors are unique, as they possess the ability to pervade discussions of social and political issues and can directly influence the way in which we think, act, and comprehend complex and abstract problems. They express systematic connections between source and target domains. However, a major challenge for metaphor researchers is to empirically quantify the entailments of metaphors in order to make principled predictions about how metaphors affect reasoning and comprehension of the domains they describe. By way of a simple metaphorical comparison task, paired with a metaphorical framing task, we seek to reduce the reliance on researchers’ intuition when deriving hypotheses regarding metaphoric persuasion. In two/four experiments, we find significant levels of congruence between a metaphorical comparison task and a metaphorical framing task, thereby providing a principled method of empirically quantifying the persuasive capacity of metaphor frames.
Recommended Citation
Iyiewuare, Peace, "Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning" (2015). Celebration of Undergraduate Research. 49.
https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/cour/2015/posters/49
Major
Psychology; Economics
Award
Oberlin College Research Fellowship (OCRF)
Project Mentor(s)
Paul Thibodeau, Psychology
Document Type
Poster
Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning
Science Center, Bent Corridor
Metaphors are unique, as they possess the ability to pervade discussions of social and political issues and can directly influence the way in which we think, act, and comprehend complex and abstract problems. They express systematic connections between source and target domains. However, a major challenge for metaphor researchers is to empirically quantify the entailments of metaphors in order to make principled predictions about how metaphors affect reasoning and comprehension of the domains they describe. By way of a simple metaphorical comparison task, paired with a metaphorical framing task, we seek to reduce the reliance on researchers’ intuition when deriving hypotheses regarding metaphoric persuasion. In two/four experiments, we find significant levels of congruence between a metaphorical comparison task and a metaphorical framing task, thereby providing a principled method of empirically quantifying the persuasive capacity of metaphor frames.